There were no weapons of mass destruction

posted January 27, 2010

Perhaps there is a difference of people’s definitions of weapons of mass destruction.  As far as I can tell the reason that term came into vogue was that President Bush could not pronounce the term “nuclear” properly.

Chemical Ali has just been hanged.  He was convicted of the genocide of 5,000 Kurds with gas.  If you believe there were no weapons of mass destruction tell that to 5,000 dead Kurds.

Was that not proof enough?

P.S. I hate the politically correct term “ethnic cleansing” because as far as I can tell it was coined to be used on the evening news so you could hear what is going on in the world and still eat your dinner.

This entry was posted in care, death penalty, disasters, judgement, politics, Reaper. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s